OK
Thursday, June 7, 2012
With recent disclosures that the Obama Administration personally operates a secret murder list that includes seventeen-year-old children in the Middle-East, it should be clear that America is moving into a new phase of transfer of power to the Executive branch, unheard of in this nation's history. A recent ruling by a judge that Obama doesn't have the right to indefinitely detain American citizens without a trial shouldn't really be cause for celebration, since Attorney General Eric Holder already argued at Yale Law school that President Obama has the right to assassinate Americans without a trial.When Congress followed up on this horrific declaration in a hearing on counter-terrorism with FBI Director Robert Mueller on whether these Executive Assassination powers applied to U.S. citizens domestically, Mueller replied that he'd "have to check." Obama takes and wants personal responsibility for all of his murders and loves it to be this way. This was also the case with Adolph Hitler, whom Germany invested all of their trust in. Of course, any leader whose acts are criminal demands "personal responsibility" for their acts so that the nation--as a collective, absolves themselves of responsibility for the actions carried out in their name. In a free nation such as the United States, where citizens are more free than most other nations of the world, the fact that virtually no public outcry among the vast majority of Americans over the executive's self-proclaimed right to assassinate them is deeply troubling. Perhaps those who are even informed about this proclamation figure that if they aren't doing anything wrong, then they have nothing to hide. However, in a Constitutional Republic, the burden of proof rests upon the government, through due process of law and evidence of the charges made against the accused, before the state revokes "life, liberty, or property." Surely, the evisceration of the Magna Carta of 1215 upon which the sixth amendment gauranteeing these rights is based, under the guise of protecting the population from "terrorism," will cause Americans to lose all three. The indoctrination of the public into the idea that wanton murder of this U.S. administration of both Americans and foreigners based upon a slight suspicion of wrong doing that the executive imagines--without the benefit of an investigation or examination by the prosecution in a court of law is preposterous.
With recent disclosures that the Obama Administration personally operates a secret murder list that includes seventeen-year-old children in the Middle-East, it should be clear that America is moving into a new phase of transfer of power to the Executive branch, unheard of in this nation's history.
A recent ruling by a judge that Obama doesn't have the right to indefinitely detain
Obama takes and wants personal responsibility for all of his murders and loves it to be this way.
This was also the case with Adolph Hitler, whom Germany invested all of their trust in. Of course, any leader whose acts are criminal demands "personal responsibility" for their acts so that the nation--as a collective, absolves themselves of responsibility for the actions carried out in their name.
In a free nation such as the United States, where citizens are more free than most other nations of the world, the fact that
The indoctrination of the public into the idea that wanton murder
The military industrial complex wages sheer war on the working/tax paying public as evidenced by the recent increase in expenditures on shipping costs to supply combat troops clearly reveals. The wars are not by any means ending any time soon, just getting more expensive while using up more of the world’s resources.
In November 2011, U.S. helicopters flying over the Pakistani border fired upon Pakistani soldiers, murdering 24 in a helicopter/jet attack on Pakistan's border positions. The unprovoked event has been left unexplained as Pakistan was at the time a close military ally of the U.S., but the retaliatory measures of the Pakistani government, which includes closing off key shipping routes to the U.S. military, has increased the cost of sending one 20-foot container of military supplies in the war by $10,000.
Now the U.S. must utilize the Northern Distribution Network.
I believe a lot of people in progressive circles are in denial. When the NYPD has their own submarines and are being called the seventh largest army in the world, things are getting pretty out-of-hand in my humble opinion. Also, it appears that the protest versus police balance has been set-off.
Whereas in the sixties, a lot of young people protesting were confronted by police in typical dress and therefore were able to have fun with them, now there are a lot of special operations style raids occurring against non-violent protesters. Tactics once reserved for AIM and BPP are now being used against non-violent squatters with precise efficiency.
http://tribune.com.pk/story/309163/only-29-of-non-military-us-supplies-go-through-pakistan-report/
The Pakistani army questioned why NATO undertook a sustained two-hour attack on well-known border positions, involving helicopters and fighter jets. A Western official said 25 Pakistani soldiers were dead as of Sunday night. The Pakistani army put the death toll at 24.
"No first fire came from Pakistan troops," said a senior Pakistani military official on Sunday. "But they did respond in self-defense after NATO gunship helicopters and jet fighters carried out unprovoked firing."
In retaliation, Pakistan indefinitely shut NATO supply lines through the country and said it was re-evaluating its military, intelligence and diplomatic links with the U.S. Authorities there gave the U.S. two weeks to pull out of a Pakistani air base that Washington has used in the past to launch drone strikes on Taliban militants, attacks that have become increasingly unpopular among Pakistani people.
In November 2011, U.S. helicopters flying over the Pakistani border fired upon Pakistani soldiers, murdering 24 in a helicopter/jet attack on Pakistan's border positions. The unprovoked event has been left unexplained as Pakistan was at the time a close military ally of the U.S., but the retaliatory measures of the Pakistani government, which includes closing off key shipping routes to the U.S. military, has increased the cost of sending one 20-foot container of military supplies in the war by $10,000.
Now the U.S. must utilize the Northern Distribution Network.
I believe a lot of people in progressive circles are in denial. When the NYPD has their own submarines and are being called the seventh largest army in the world, things are getting pretty out-of-hand in my humble opinion. Also, it appears that the protest versus police balance has been set-off.
Whereas in the sixties, a lot of young people protesting were confronted by police in typical dress and therefore were able to have fun with them, now there are a lot of special operations style raids occurring against non-violent protesters. Tactics once reserved for AIM and BPP are now being used against non-violent squatters with precise efficiency.
http://tribune.com.pk/story/309163/only-29-of-non-military-us-supplies-go-through-pakistan-report/
The Pakistani army questioned why NATO undertook a sustained two-hour attack on well-known border positions, involving helicopters and fighter jets. A Western official said 25 Pakistani soldiers were dead as of Sunday night. The Pakistani army put the death toll at 24.
"No first fire came from Pakistan troops," said a senior Pakistani military official on Sunday. "But they did respond in self-defense after NATO gunship helicopters and jet fighters carried out unprovoked firing."
In retaliation, Pakistan indefinitely shut NATO supply lines through the country and said it was re-evaluating its military, intelligence and diplomatic links with the U.S. Authorities there gave the U.S. two weeks to pull out of a Pakistani air base that Washington has used in the past to launch drone strikes on Taliban militants, attacks that have become increasingly unpopular among Pakistani people.
Friday, May 4, 2012
(MAD-COW/FTA AGREEMENT)
Under the United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement, a full 80 percent of U.S. exports to Korea become duty-free on March 15, 2012.
The agreement is presented by the Obama administration as a way to refurbish the nations' manufacturing base through the sale of "Made-in-America" goods, services, and agricultural products to the Korean market. Nearly 95 percent of bilateral trade in consumer and industrial products will become duty free within five years of that date.
Most of the remaining tariffs would be eliminated within the next 10 years according to the Office of the United States Trade Representative website.
The rapid recovery of Korea's economy lifted U.S. consumer-ready exports to more than $1.4 billion in 2003—49 percent of total U.S. agricultural exports to Korea. Trade in beef disappeared in 2004 because of the discovery of a case of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE, or "mad cow" disease) in a U.S. cow at the end of 2003. In addition, poultry meat exports to South Korea suffered from a temporary embargo on trade in 2004 after an outbreak of Avian Influenza in the United States. Oranges, orange juice, frozen vegetables—especially french fries—sweet corn, and a large variety of processed foods and beverages make up the rest of this trade. Trade in these products continues to grow as Korea's economy expands. They represented 33 percent of U.S. agricultural exports to Korea in 2010.
Seoul's resumption of U.S. beef imports in 2008 sparked daily candlelight vigils and street protests for several months as many South Koreans still regarded the meat as a public health risk.
South Korea imports U.S. beef from cows less than 30 months old and there is no direct link between U.S. beef imported into South Korea and the infected animal, the country's agriculture ministry said in a statement. The infected U.S. cow was older than 30 months.
The latest mad cow case may jeopardize moves to expand American beef sales in Taiwan, where the government recently sparked protests by allowing sales of U.S. beef containing ractopamine, a growth additive.
Taiwan's legislature on Wednesday indefinitely postponed a planned discussion on U.S. beef imports. It is likely the government engineered the delay, fearing that the opposition would stoke sentiment against U.S. beef.
There was no immediate response from China's government. Beijing no longer has an outright ban on U.S. beef but exporters have been unable to overcome continued barriers involving inspection of the meat.
Hong Kong's food safety regulator said it was staying in close contact with U.S. authorities who had confirmed the cow was not slaughtered for human consumption
American dairy to benefit from U.S.-Korea FTA
The U.S. Dairy Export Council and the National Milk Producers Federation are welcoming the launch today of the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement(KORUS), saying it is the most economically significant U.S. FTA in nearly two decades.
The groups took the lead role in working with U.S. government officials to represent industry interests during trade negotiations, they stated in a press release today.
The FTA provides immediate zero tariff access for whey for feed use, as well as duty-free access for a total of 16,000 tons of cheese, milk powders, whey for food use and other products. The agreement also calls for most of Korea's remaining tariffs to be phased out in 5 to 10 years.
First-year access alone for dairy food products equates to 270 million pounds of U.S.-produced milk, said Jerry Kozak, president and CEO of NMPF.
Consumption of U.S. dairy products in Korea has risen steadily. U.S. cheese exports to Korea grew 75 percent in 2011, reaching nearly 72 million pounds, making the U.S. the largest supplier with a 43 percent market share.
The groups expect KORUS to further encourage this trend as the terms of the FTA come into effect and influence food prices in Korea.
While there is no cookie cutter design for freestall barns that accommodates the needs of all herds, there are some rules of thumb. Holstein breeders gathered on March 23, at Sunnyside Dairy Farm near Valders to learn from Manitowoc County UW-Extension agent Scott Gunderson how modern dairy facilities can be functional and comfortable for large-framed cows.
Sunnyside Dairy was the first stop in a series of spring barn meetings hosted throughout the state by the Wisconsin Holstein Association. Todd Borgwardt and his uncle Bill own the dairy in partnership, representing several generations of the Borgwardt family as renowned Registered Holstein breeders. Todd’s father Roger continues to be involved on the farm, and his cousin Cory joined the operation two years ago.
“Breed for type, manage for production” is the philosophy at Sunnyside Dairy. And the Borgwardts have done just that. With a rolling herd average of 27,305, they have achieved notable production on their 250-cow herd. At the same time, they continue to focus on the tradition of type, with their most recent classification resulting in 6 Excellent cows, 40 Very Good, 80 Good Plus and 33 Good milking females.
http://www.agriview.com/news/dairy/sunnyside-dairy-focuses-on-comfort-for-large-cows/article_3dbf0586-7f6f-11e1-9731-001a4bcf887a.html
Sunnyside dairy
http://www.manta.com/c/mm76h60/benjert-farm-inc
Thursday, April 19, 2012
rip off
With recent disclosures that the Obama Administration operates a secret murder list that includes seventeen-year-old children in the Middle-East, should anyone be worried at the rampant
A recent ruling by a judge that
Obama takes and wants personal responsibility for all of his murders and loves it to be this way.
This was also the case with Adolph Hitler, whom Germany invested all of their trust in. Of course, any leader whose acts are criminal demands "personal responsibility" for their acts so as t cause the nation--as a collective, to absolve themselves of responsibility for their actions.
In a free nation such as the United States, where citizens are more free than most other nations of the world, the fact that
The indoctrination of the public
The military industrial complex wages sheer war on the working/tax paying public as evidenced by the recent increase in expenditures on shipping costs to supply combat troops clearly reveals. The wars are not by any means ending any time soon, just getting more expensive while using up more of the world’s resources.
In November 2011, U.S. helicopters flying over the Pakistani border fired upon Pakistani soldiers, murdering 24 in a helicopter/jet attack on Pakistan's border positions. The unprovoked event has been left unexplained as Pakistan was at the time a close military ally of the U.S., but the retaliatory measures of the Pakistani government, which includes closing off key shipping routes to the U.S. military, has increased the cost of sending one 20-foot container of military supplies in the war by $10,000.
Now the U.S. must utilize the Northern Distribution Network.
I believe a lot of people in progressive circles are in denial. When the NYPD has their own submarines and are being called the seventh largest army in the world, things are getting pretty out-of-hand in my humble opinion. Also, it appears that the protest versus police balance has been set-off.
Whereas in the sixties, a lot of young people protesting were confronted by police in typical dress and therefore were able to have fun with them, now there are a lot of special operations style raids occurring against non-violent protesters. Tactics once reserved for AIM and BPP are now being used against non-violent squatters with precise efficiency.
http://tribune.com.pk/story/309163/only-29-of-non-military-us-supplies-go-through-pakistan-report/
The Pakistani army questioned why NATO undertook a sustained two-hour attack on well-known border positions, involving helicopters and fighter jets. A Western official said 25 Pakistani soldiers were dead as of Sunday night. The Pakistani army put the death toll at 24.
"No first fire came from Pakistan troops," said a senior Pakistani military official on Sunday. "But they did respond in self-defense after NATO gunship helicopters and jet fighters carried out unprovoked firing."
In retaliation, Pakistan indefinitely shut NATO supply lines through the country and said it was re-evaluating its military, intelligence and diplomatic links with the U.S. Authorities there gave the U.S. two weeks to pull out of a Pakistani air base that Washington has used in the past to launch drone strikes on Taliban militants, attacks that have become increasingly unpopular among Pakistani people.
In November 2011, U.S. helicopters flying over the Pakistani border fired upon Pakistani soldiers, murdering 24 in a helicopter/jet attack on Pakistan's border positions. The unprovoked event has been left unexplained as Pakistan was at the time a close military ally of the U.S., but the retaliatory measures of the Pakistani government, which includes closing off key shipping routes to the U.S. military, has increased the cost of sending one 20-foot container of military supplies in the war by $10,000.
Now the U.S. must utilize the Northern Distribution Network.
I believe a lot of people in progressive circles are in denial. When the NYPD has their own submarines and are being called the seventh largest army in the world, things are getting pretty out-of-hand in my humble opinion. Also, it appears that the protest versus police balance has been set-off.
Whereas in the sixties, a lot of young people protesting were confronted by police in typical dress and therefore were able to have fun with them, now there are a lot of special operations style raids occurring against non-violent protesters. Tactics once reserved for AIM and BPP are now being used against non-violent squatters with precise efficiency.
http://tribune.com.pk/story/309163/only-29-of-non-military-us-supplies-go-through-pakistan-report/
The Pakistani army questioned why NATO undertook a sustained two-hour attack on well-known border positions, involving helicopters and fighter jets. A Western official said 25 Pakistani soldiers were dead as of Sunday night. The Pakistani army put the death toll at 24.
"No first fire came from Pakistan troops," said a senior Pakistani military official on Sunday. "But they did respond in self-defense after NATO gunship helicopters and jet fighters carried out unprovoked firing."
In retaliation, Pakistan indefinitely shut NATO supply lines through the country and said it was re-evaluating its military, intelligence and diplomatic links with the U.S. Authorities there gave the U.S. two weeks to pull out of a Pakistani air base that Washington has used in the past to launch drone strikes on Taliban militants, attacks that have become increasingly unpopular among Pakistani people.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)